Charlotte Cotton, “Lise Sarfati, Recent Work”
Aperture 180 Fall 2005

I first became familiar with Lise Sarfati’s work through her series of stunning photographs made in Russian
cities, including Moscow, Norilsk and Vorkuta, in the 1990s. A fluent Russian speaker, Sarfati focused in
this body of work on a kind of brutal “bohemia,” and the intensity of life in the midst of post-Soviet decay.
Those images proved her to be a sensitive and imaginative observer-of dread-filled, decaying industrial sites
that serve as metaphors for chronic loss and waste, and of physically and socially ostracized young people.
She showed us the inmates of an institution for young offenders in Iksha, patiently biding their time and
their punishments. She followed the lives of Muscovite transsexuals undergoing gender redefinition.
Throughout her work, Sarfati manages to create a loose and layered visualization that allows us, the viewers,
to consider the complexities of any place or time, and one that triggers emotions and thoughts that
move beyond the ostensible subjects of her photographs.

Sarfati has a capacity for shifting her photographic antennae and adopting multiple understandings of a
place and its society. This was proven in her Russian imagery, as it is in her new series made in the United
States, which is featured in these pages. Her work plays an important part in today’s debates about the
uses and visual languages of socially engaged photography, in that Sarfati stubbornly resists “objectifying”
the subjects that she is compelled to photograph. Her sense of curiosity is profoundly intuitive, and profoundly human. While we are used to viewing photographs of such subjects-including the legacy of the
collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, as well as the leitmotif that American youth
can offer on the state of U.S. society-Sarfati consciously undermines any desire for or expectation of a single
or defining perspective upon complex social ideas. Her photographs are much more concerned with
activating within us a connection-via aesthetics and the intensity of her encounters with her subjects-with
our world on a much more immediate and less quasi-informational way.

When I met with Sarfati recently, I made the mistake of describing her latest series as a selection of “portraits
of American teenagers.” Sarfati called me on this oversimplification, pointing out that I was adopting
a contraposition to these subjects. The term teenager, she suggested, is a categorization most often used
by adults; and further, she believes that it is a largely market-driven label for a relatively new but powerful
consumer group. It is not, at any rate for Sarfati, a term by which young people generally define themselves,
nor is this idea what drew her to make this body of work. Sarfati’s photographic investigations into
the young people that she encountered in shopping malls and streets and homes in the United States are
not intended as projections of an adult onto a remembered period of earlier life. There is a strange practicality in Sarfati’s choice of subject matter: it is remarkable that this diminutive but very intense
Frenchwoman-so out of place in the American cities where she traveled-found connections between her
subjects’ “out-of-place” feelings and her own. The age range of those Sarfati photographed may be indicative of her recognition of their openness to requests (to them and their parents) to reveal this shared
human experience. There’s little sense here that this series of images is the result of Sarfati’s confidently
choreographing these young people into the usual photographic allegories of dislocation or disenfranchisement, regardless of the actual situations or states of minds of these individuals. If anything, I suspect that what she has unlocked are mutual experiences of uncertainty-wrapped up in the mainly nonverbal, notfully-
determined or explained way in which she conducts each of her photographic portrayals.

In the realm of contemporary art photography, the depiction of teenagers has lately become a trope of
sorts. This is not to suggest that practitioners of great integrity, such as Rineke Dijkstra and Hellen van
Meene, haven’t contributed bodies of work of subtlety and meaning with their representations of youth.
But this choice of subject has become a fairly easy symbol in much contemporary art photography, which
perhaps cynically aims to invest itself with these values merely by representing youth as a fragile and fugitive
moment in life. Sarfati’s subtle visualizations of the passions and frustrations of these young people-all
on the cusp of adult responsibility-in Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, Oregon, and California, might be misread
as the latest addition to photography’s recent near-obsession with this highly photogenic stage of life.
Her subject, however, as she herself asserts, is not youth or “teenagerhood” per se, but the possibilities
inherent in that period of life, during which emotions are close to the surface, reminding us of the individuality,
vulnerability, and also fortitude that we all carry. Sarfati’s American series began (typically for her)
with intense research and preparation before any pictures were made; she is a prepossessed artist who
internally questions and qualifies her reasoning for being drawn to a subject.

She acknowledges her attraction to lives that are being shaped by the paradoxes of where we come from
and our aspirations of where we are heading, and she understands that the investigation of such lives is
most likely to be possible in sites of massive social shift (such as postindustrial towns in Russia) as well as
in the physical manifestations of selfhood that young people consciously project. I imagine that all this
allows her to be a relatively anxiety-free maker of photographs, attuned not only to her own motivations
but also, in the case of these particular images, to the subtle and unexpected encounters she is liable to
have, once she’s located the people and places that emit such emotive capacities. It is not entirely surprising
that this fluid and substantial body of work was made over the course of only two journeys to America.

It is an example of one of those uncanny experiences for photographers, impossible to fully predict, simulate,
or repeat (with any certainty): the photographs, Sarfati says, just “happened.” She did not overtly
orchestrate or attempt to define her subjects, but was carried by her own notion that, in the process of
creating, she was exploring and understanding them. While her presence inevitably acted upon these
young people, she also created the psychological space for them, in turn, to act upon her. This perhaps
accounts for Sarfati’s success in representing these American youths as-individually and universally-the carriers of states of mind that center on willful self-determination-states of mind that are by no means exclusive
to her chosen subjects.

Charlotte Cotton